Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On May 9, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> And dollar for dollar, SCSI will NOT be faster nor have the hard
>> drive capacity that you will get with SATA.
>
> Does this hold true still under heavy concurrent-write loads? I'm
> preparing yet another big DB server and if SATA is a better option,
> I'm all (elephant) ears.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've never heard of a 15kRPM SATA drive.
-Doug
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
