Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Aren't these suggestions mutually contradictory?
> No, they're orthogonal. The pretty printer would get the indenting and
> line feeds correct, the obfuscator would replace actual names with "A",
> "B" or "Table1" etc..
Hmm, that's not what I'd call an "obfuscator", more an "anonymizer".
Code obfuscators are generally intended to make code unreadable
(in fact de-pretty-printing is one of their chief techniques).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
