On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 12:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Aren't these suggestions mutually contradictory? > > > No, they're orthogonal. The pretty printer would get the indenting and > > line feeds correct, the obfuscator would replace actual names with "A", > > "B" or "Table1" etc.. > > Hmm, that's not what I'd call an "obfuscator", more an "anonymizer". > Code obfuscators are generally intended to make code unreadable > (in fact de-pretty-printing is one of their chief techniques).
That's a better term. I did say "name obfuscator" but I can see how that was confusing, especially with the recent discussion on code obfuscation. Sorry about that. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
