On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:05 PM, <gnuo...@rcn.com> wrote: > Spoken like a dyed in the wool COBOL coder. The RM has no need for order; > it's set based. I've dabbled in PG for some time, and my sense is > increasingly that PG developers are truly code oriented, not database (set) > oriented.
I'm struggling to think of an adequate response to this. I think I'm going to go with: huh? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
