On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:51 AM, <gnuo...@rcn.com> wrote: > Not insulting, just amused bemusement. PG portrays itself as the best OS > database, which it may well be. But it does so by stressing the > row-by-agonizing-row approach to data. In other words, as just a record > paradigm filestore for COBOL/java/C coders. I was expecting more Relational > oomph. As Dr. Codd says: "A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data > Banks". Less code, more data.
So what, exactly, would give pgsql more relationally "oomph"? Your assertion feels pretty hand wavy right now. -- To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
