Also, (2) only really works if you're going to obsolesce (remove) archive records after a certain period of time. Otherwise the sub-partitioning hurts performance.
Is there any moves to include the "easy" table partitioning in the 9.2 version ?
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
