On 1/13/12 2:44 AM, alexandre - aldeia digital wrote: >> >> Also, (2) only really works if you're going to obsolesce (remove) >> archive records after a certain period of time. Otherwise the >> sub-partitioning hurts performance. >> > > Is there any moves to include the "easy" table partitioning in the 9.2 > version ?
Nobody has been submitting patches. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
