Cea Stapleton <c...@healthfinch.com> writes: > Weâre using pg_restore (PostgreSQL) 9.5.4 for the restores. Weâve used > variations on the job number: > /usr/bin/pg_restore -j 6 -Fc -O -c -d DBNAME RESTORE_FILEâ
OK ... do you actually need the -c, and if so why? > Weâll take a look at the memory overcommit - would that also explain the > index issues we were seeing before we were seeing the crashes? Unlikely. I'm guessing that there's some sort of race condition involved in parallel restore with -c, but it's not very clear what. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance