Cea Stapleton <c...@healthfinch.com> writes:
> We’re using pg_restore (PostgreSQL) 9.5.4 for the restores. We’ve used 
> variations on the job number:
> /usr/bin/pg_restore -j 6 -Fc -O -c -d DBNAME RESTORE_FILE”

OK ... do you actually need the -c, and if so why?

> We’ll take a look at the memory overcommit - would that also explain the 
> index issues we were seeing before we were seeing the crashes?

Unlikely.  I'm guessing that there's some sort of race condition involved
in parallel restore with -c, but it's not very clear what.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to