"Ross J. Reedstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm, with the new dependency code, is the auto-sequence from a SERIAL > in a temp table also a temp sequence? It get's put in the temp schema, > right? Seems we have a workaround for those wanting numbered result > sets.
That's the hard way; just do CREATE TEMP SEQUENCE ... works in prior releases too ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]