"Ross J. Reedstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, with the new dependency code, is the auto-sequence from a SERIAL
> in a temp table also a temp sequence? It get's put in the temp schema,
> right? Seems we have a workaround for those wanting numbered result
> sets.

That's the hard way; just do CREATE TEMP SEQUENCE ... works in prior
releases too ...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to