Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Ram Nathaniel wrote:
>> 2) aggregated concatenation:
> Theoretically, you should be able to do this right now in PostgreSQL with
> user defined aggregates (although you can't pass a second argument
> currently for the separator).
There's nothing particularly stopping us from supporting
multiple-argument aggregates, except a lack of round tuits.
(I suppose we'd want to rethink the syntax of CREATE AGGREGATE,
but otherwise it ought to be pretty straightforward.)
> I believe that an ordered subquery in FROM
> will currently allow you to get an ordered aggregate, or perhaps you'd
> have to turn off hash aggregation, but I think you should be able to get
> it to keep the ordering.
I think you would want to ORDER BY twice:
SELECT class, list(student) from
(select class, student from grades order by class, student) ss
order by class;
It looks like (at least in CVS tip) planner.c will take into account the
relative costs of doing a GroupAgg vs doing a HashAgg and re-sorting,
but I'm too tired to try it right now...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
