as a user of both, I would say that picoGUI has theme support and built in WM. microwindows is a bit further along only because there are more bodies working on it, (Micah and the rest of the developers here are phenomenal in how fast they implement things out of thin air.) I have been reviewing both embedded GUI's for several products/projects myself. PicoGUI has it in perl support (It at least has a perl module) whereas microwindows/nano-x has it in speed right now. (It may be due to themes and the maturity of the video drivers.) these are only my observations, the speed that both projects are moving, it will be different in the near future. Hope I've helped. -----Original Message----- From: John Utz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 4:16 PM To: Micah Dowty Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Pgui-devel] Re: [vhl-tools-devel] First Pico/Linux release for the Helio On 17 Apr 2001, Micah Dowty wrote: > After hastily fixing the more critical bugs and hacking at the kernel a bit, I have released the first PicoGUI-based Linux distrobution for the VTech Helio. ROM images, source, and screenshots at: > > http://pgui.sourceforge.net/picolinux-helio.php this looks quite tasty! could you tell me what you perceive the differences are between picogui, microwindows and nanogui? if you dona have any opinion, that's fine too, but if you do have one i would really like to learn about it. tnx! johnu _______________________________________________ Pgui-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pgui-devel _______________________________________________ Pgui-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pgui-devel
