On 15 May 2013, at 20:01, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the effort Markus!

+10

And let's hope the lists are stable now.

> On 15.05.2013, at 19:52, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> So now that everything is working… sorry for the mess.
>> 
>> We should have left the gforge infrastructure the last time we had a 
>> multi-day problem,
>> not wait till we get it again.
>> 
>> I think this will be my new principle: second real problem -> I leave. No 
>> discussions.
>> We already saw with the jenkins story just how deadly bad infrastructure is.
>> 
>> So what happened was that last Tuesday, the lists (all lists of gforge) 
>> stopped delivering.
>> Why is not clear, seemingly it was not gforge itself but the upstream 
>> servers  did
>> not deliver. Whatever.
>> What is clear is that it was completely unclear how long this would take, 
>> and that we
>> needed a solution after nearly a week of waiting.
>> 
>> So we decided to move the lists. Of course with the old lists down, this was 
>> harder than
>> normal (even involved parsing the html to get the subscribers…) but that is 
>> not important.
>> 
>> Now the problem its hat Mailman does not distinguish between people that 
>> unsubscribe,
>> and those turning off delivery. So there where just a lot of people listed 
>> with "nomail (U)",
>> 
>> What to do? It was clear that we can't just subscribe lots of people to a 
>> list that they *actively*
>> unsubscribed. So the only option was to skip those by
>>      -> unsubscribing them from the old list
>>      -> then get the list of subscribers
>>      -> put that in the new list.
>> 
>> The only people that will see a bad effect are those using e.g nabble to 
>> read the list. But those
>> would see the new mails, too. The only problem they have is if the want to 
>> send. So not *that* of
>> a big deal.
>> 
>> It seems that we got quite some false positive subscribers anyway in the 
>> form of people who filtered
>> the mails and then with the new list the filter did not work and they 
>> suddenly saw mails of a long forgotten
>> list. We even had the case of people who where "nomail (U)", yet they did 
>> get mails delivered. How
>> that can possibly work, I have  no clue *at all*.
>> 
>> What else is missing (and on my TODO since Sunday/Monday, sorry for not yet 
>> acting on it):
>> 
>>      -> lists.pharo.org has an empty page and needs to point to the list of 
>> the lists inttead
>>      -> the archive needs to be moved from the old jenkins.
>>      -> the (incomplete) archive of the new lists is not working since I put 
>> it as public.
>> 
>> So… maybe it would have been better to just wait until gforge works again 
>> and then move… but
>> it was just far too long already and not clear when it would be working 
>> again.
>> 
>>      Marcus
> 
> 


Reply via email to