Do not expect us to change the classbuilder in 2.0 :) I agree with marcus
Stef >>> I thought so. Attached hack removes it. >>> >> >> Of course a complete rewrite of the class builder is ready for integration… >> >> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/Slot/ >> >> So the question is if it makes sense to add this one? > > Hm...I'm not sure what you mean. Let put it this way? Any chance > 2.0 will allow lowercase class names? If not, fine with me, I'll patch > ClassBuilder before loading my packages. > > Jan >
