Why not something like bindKeyCombination:toAction:
? Ben On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:28 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: > excellent > so how do we integrate this change? > > I will chnage the chapter on keymapping :) > > > On Jun 18, 2013, at 9:57 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I prefer the onKeyCombination* because of the following rationale: >> >> - to me a shortcut is the association between a key combination and an action >> - a key combination is a combination of keys :), which is associated with an >> action >> >> Stef, so far I changed the asShortcut => asKeyCombination, following the >> same idea :). >> >> Guille >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >> <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: >> >> On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:21 PM, GOUBIER Thierry <thierry.goub...@cea.fr> wrote: >> >> > The problem with onkeypress, onkeydown, onkeyup is that they are low-level >> > events compared to the shortcuts we are talking about. >> > >> > A shortcut is at least one key, but is usually a key + a modifier or a >> > sequence of key + modifiers (such as the emacs ^X ^C ($x ctrl, $c ctrl). >> > The Keymapping stuff sits a lot higher than the basic keypress events >> > (which do exist as well) and can recognize multi-keys combinations. If you >> > call that onKeyPress:do:, then you loose in the name part of the power of >> > it. >> > >> > Hence the onKeyCombination:do: (but I prefer onShortcut:do:) >> >> onShortcut:do: looks good to me. >> >> Stef >> >> >> > >> > Thierry >> > ________________________________________ >> > De : Pharo-dev [pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] de la part de Esteban >> > A. Maringolo [emaring...@gmail.com] >> > Date d'envoi : mardi 18 juin 2013 18:14 >> > À : Pharo Development List >> > Objet : Re: [Pharo-dev] on:do: for shortcuts? >> > >> > 2013/6/18 Clément Bera <bera.clem...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> On Javascript, there are : >> >> >> >> onkeypress >> >> onkeydown >> >> onkeyup >> >> >> >> >> >> I think we should have same API than other languages, especially popular >> >> ones. So 1 of these 3 would be the best for me. >> >> >> >> Why not onKeyPress:do: ? >> > >> > +1 to each of the last two statements. >> > >> > >> >> >> >
