If we want to have an Object>>is:, why not: Object>>is: aSymbol ^ aSymbol = self class name
? Like this, I do not have to override it unless I need to rely on a different mechanism. Cheers, Doru On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]>wrote: > > On 2013-06-23, at 19:19, Nicolas Cellier < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Except that if an object both is: this and is: that, from two different > > packages, this will lead to an override. > > from which package? #is: doesn't seem to be used in general > > > 2013/6/23 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> > > > >> > >> On 23 Jun 2013, at 18:14, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> can we remove that, or is this still in use? > >> > >> Hmm, no senders, no implementors, but the idea is not bad: it could > >> replace a lot of methods. And it bears the signature of some illustrious > >> hackers… > >> > >> Sven > >> > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
