On Jun 23, 2013, at 10:08 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just remove it :) I do not really like to have extra symbol not directly connected to their classes. I understand the idea behind is: but …. > Doru > > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2013-06-23, at 21:40, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Actually, a better implementation would be: > > > > Object>>is: aClassOrSymbol > > ^ aClassOrSymbol asString = self class name asString > > > > > Like this you can even pass the class instead of its name (I presume that > > printOn: will not change any time soon so we can rely on the fact that we > > can polymorphically obtain the name of the class via asString). > > > ... and we're starting from scratch again, sorry, I spent too much time > discussing > this already :P > > => I am very much against comparing strings, this just doesn't scale > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow"
