On Aug 12, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Clément Bera <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2013/8/12 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > >> yeah it tries to do 'bag at: 1' which fails. How would look like a nice bag >> inspector ? > > same as set or dictionary > a bag is conceptually a collection of pair > > Ok I will make a slice > > Now what would be nice is that we can have a default inspector that does not > interpret the structure. > > It exists, it is 'object basicInspect', or in the inspector, right click on > self, then click on basicInspect. > > It would be also nice that when we dive into an object when we close the > window the system popup to the previous object > > This happens when you don't dive but open a new window with Cmd+i, it is the > old inspector workflow that still works on purpose. If it pops up the last > object on close there is no advantage of dive instead of the old inspector > that pops new windows. > > because this is annoying to close the complete stack > we could have a shift or option variant that close everything. > > I don't know. 10 days ago, Erwan did a tool bar for the inspector that may > help (the slice is waiting in fix review needed). did you look at it? does it work? I will add it to the list of things I should look at. Stef > > > >> 2013/8/11 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> >> (Bag new add: 3 ; add: 3 ; add: 3 ; add: 2 ;yourself) inspect >> >> we got an error when trying to see the second element. >> >> >> Stef >> >> > >
