2013/8/12 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > > On Aug 12, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Clément Bera <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2013/8/12 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > >> >> yeah it tries to do 'bag at: 1' which fails. How would look like a nice >> bag inspector ? >> >> >> same as set or dictionary >> a bag is conceptually a collection of pair >> > > Ok I will make a slice > >> >> Now what would be nice is that we can have a default inspector that does >> not interpret the structure. >> >> It exists, it is 'object basicInspect', or in the inspector, right click > on self, then click on basicInspect. > >> >> It would be also nice that when we dive into an object when we close the >> window the system popup to the previous object >> > > This happens when you don't dive but open a new window with Cmd+i, it is > the old inspector workflow that still works on purpose. If it pops up the > last object on close there is no advantage of dive instead of the old > inspector that pops new windows. > > >> because this is annoying to close the complete stack >> we could have a shift or option variant that close everything. >> > > I don't know. 10 days ago, Erwan did a tool bar for the inspector that may > help (the slice is waiting in fix review needed). > > > did you look at it? > does it work? > I will add it to the list of things I should look at. >
I've just had a quick look, it does not look very beautiful but it works fine. I think we should integrate then people can improve it incrementally. It is a nice first step. > Stef > > >> >> >> 2013/8/11 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> >> >>> (Bag new add: 3 ; add: 3 ; add: 3 ; add: 2 ;yourself) inspect >>> >>> we got an error when trying to see the second element. >>> >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Clément Béra Mate Virtual Machine Engineer Bâtiment B 40, avenue Halley 59650 *Villeneuve d'Ascq*
