On 2013-08-21, at 17:37, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >>> There are some problems in NativeBoost if a method does not belong to the >>> class itself, i don't understand the problem very well but that is what >>> Igor and Stef told me. > > > Some methods are placeholder for generated code and the placeholder cannot be > avoided and there is nothing wrong in the design. > > This is why such system wide tests should be replaced by rules that each > package declare as false positive and adapt to the package own > practice.
but that doesn't justify that the methods have the same contents, AFAIK this is what the test compares. And I still think form a outside viewpoint duplicated methods do not make sense at all, NativeBoost should be no exception there.
