On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:44 PM, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2013-08-21, at 17:37, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> There are some problems in NativeBoost if a method does not belong to the >>>> class itself, i don't understand the problem very well but that is what >>>> Igor and Stef told me. >> >> >> Some methods are placeholder for generated code and the placeholder cannot >> be avoided and there is nothing wrong in the design. >> >> This is why such system wide tests should be replaced by rules that each >> package declare as false positive and adapt to the package own >> practice. > > but that doesn't justify that the methods have the same contents, AFAIK this > is what the test compares. so do you think that we should generate method value 'foo1' value 'foo2' value 'foo3' just to satisfy a test that does not apply? > > And I still think form a outside viewpoint duplicated methods do not make > sense at all, NativeBoost should be no exception there. > >
