I have a different opinion. This modality issue is not something we fix as
a bug. Of course, we can put in place a patch that somehow makes it work in
the current browser, but the core problem is a conceptual one. And that
requires a redesign of the user interface.

If we have a problem with a code model, we do not just put an if to patch
the thing. Ok, sometimes we do that just because we cannot see a different
solution, but we are not comfortable with it. We have to treat the user
interface in the same way.

Doru


On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On Sep 3, 2013, at 9:27 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > agreed we should change that since years.
> > Some days we should stop and fix all the glitches that give us these
> hiccups.
>
> ... and that day is around october, when we freeze pharo3 and start to fix
> bugs :)
>
> Esteban
>
> >
> > stef
> >
> > On Sep 3, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> this is most annoying to me, that UI interrupts you in very strange
> manner
> >> and asks you to make a decision:
> >> - accept, or discard the method, or cancel the action.
> >>
> >> often, you are in the middle of typing new stuff and source code
> >> can be even not syntactically correct.. so, you have to discard or die
> :)
> >>
> >> what i think the solution could be is that browser should allow you to
> switch contexts
> >> at any moment without asking you anything.Instead it should remember
> your
> >> unsaved changes in special 'drafts' collection, which later you can get
> back on,
> >> when you finish what you wanted to do.
> >>
> >> And the only time when you want unaccepted edits to not get lost
> forever is when you closing
> >> a browser window.. (but of course, drafts can be stored globally
> somewhere,
> >> then it also not a big deal, since you can simply return to your draft
> in different window).
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> Igor Stasenko.
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

Reply via email to