I think that’s a good idea. Obviously that’s something that none of us developers want in the system but it would be good to have it from a promotional point of view I guess. Could applications like Dr. Geo benefit from such an environment?
Max On 01.11.2013, at 19:56, Gisela Decuzzi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, I don't know where to send the proposal and I think that the list would > be a good place to talk about it. > The main idea is to have a "safe" image, or a way to block or restrict the > modificable parts in the system, in order to avoid mistakes during the > learning. > > It could include protected packages, reduced browsers showing by default user > packages, configurable rules (by example: you can not create a class with > empty category, you can not create a class with the same name that a known > one). > Maybe we can have a way to configure or to ask for permission to modificate > some parts of the system. > Also, some filters during debugging, to avoid "protected" code. > An easy way to obtain that image > > The idea is to reduce the common errors that we make when we start > programming also to help teachers. > > >
