Another similar project is a real working Image Locker for deploying... but not sure how much important it is...
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that’s a good idea. Obviously that’s something that none of us > developers want in the system but it would be good to have it from a > promotional point of view I guess. Could applications like Dr. Geo benefit > from such an environment? > > Max > > > On 01.11.2013, at 19:56, Gisela Decuzzi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, I don't know where to send the proposal and I think that the list > would be a good place to talk about it. > > The main idea is to have a "safe" image, or a way to block or restrict > the modificable parts in the system, in order to avoid mistakes during the > learning. > > > > It could include protected packages, reduced browsers showing by default > user packages, configurable rules (by example: you can not create a class > with empty category, you can not create a class with the same name that a > known one). > > Maybe we can have a way to configure or to ask for permission to > modificate some parts of the system. > > Also, some filters during debugging, to avoid "protected" code. > > An easy way to obtain that image > > > > The idea is to reduce the common errors that we make when we start > programming also to help teachers. > > > > > > > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
