Thanks. Doru
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]>wrote: > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12064/Selecting-a-package-in-the-Monticello-browser > > Alexandre > > > On Nov 3, 2013, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Nope :( > > > > Ben > > > > On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:52, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Strange. Pharo 2.0 does not seem to have the replication of repository > instances problem. Any idea what introduced this? > >> > >> Doru > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Benjamin < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The thing is you use to have one instance of the same MCRepository per > package. > >> By example, the Pharo repository was in fact #{packageNumber} instances. > >> > >> So the change you make on one (by example, string your password) was > not reflected to the others. > >> And it seems that during the fix of this, this issue was introduced. > >> > >> (I think the easy solution taken was to have the same repositories for > everything). > >> It’s indeed kind of a paint o deal with, but a smaller one that it use > to be :) > >> > >> Definitely it’s a bug, not a feature :) > >> We should wait tip Guillermo’s answer since he was the one fixing this > painful behaviour (2 sprints ago) > >> > >> Ben > >> > >> On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:44, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I do not understand what the password has to do with showing only the > relevant repositories for a selected package. Could you explain? > >>> > >>> Doru > >>> > >>> > >>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Benjamin < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The idea was that repositories were shared among packages. > >>>> > >>>> Otherwise, you have to type your password a billion times > >>>> > >>>> Ben > >>>> > >>>> On 03 Nov 2013, at 21:49, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Indeed, I wanted to raise this issue as well. The Monticello browser > is a rather terrible interface, but at least the scoping of repositories > was useful. Is the change intentional, or is it a bug? > >>>>> > >>>>> Doru > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> Hi! > >>>>> > >>>>> Before, when one selects a package (left list), then only the set of > relevant repositories are displayed (right list). This is now not the case > anymore. I think I have seen somewhere a MC package is not associated to a > repository anymore. What is the idea behind this? I find this rather > convenient... > >>>>> > >>>>> Alexandre > >>>>> -- > >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > >>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>>>> > >>>>> "Every thing has its own flow" > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>> > >>> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> www.tudorgirba.com > >> > >> "Every thing has its own flow" > > > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
