See also https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10263 Phil
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. > > Doru > > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12064/Selecting-a-package-in-the-Monticello-browser >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On Nov 3, 2013, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Nope :( >> > >> > Ben >> > >> > On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:52, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Strange. Pharo 2.0 does not seem to have the replication of repository >> instances problem. Any idea what introduced this? >> >> >> >> Doru >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Benjamin < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> The thing is you use to have one instance of the same MCRepository per >> package. >> >> By example, the Pharo repository was in fact #{packageNumber} >> instances. >> >> >> >> So the change you make on one (by example, string your password) was >> not reflected to the others. >> >> And it seems that during the fix of this, this issue was introduced. >> >> >> >> (I think the easy solution taken was to have the same repositories for >> everything). >> >> It’s indeed kind of a paint o deal with, but a smaller one that it use >> to be :) >> >> >> >> Definitely it’s a bug, not a feature :) >> >> We should wait tip Guillermo’s answer since he was the one fixing this >> painful behaviour (2 sprints ago) >> >> >> >> Ben >> >> >> >> On 03 Nov 2013, at 22:44, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I do not understand what the password has to do with showing only the >> relevant repositories for a selected package. Could you explain? >> >>> >> >>> Doru >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Benjamin < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> The idea was that repositories were shared among packages. >> >>>> >> >>>> Otherwise, you have to type your password a billion times >> >>>> >> >>>> Ben >> >>>> >> >>>> On 03 Nov 2013, at 21:49, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Indeed, I wanted to raise this issue as well. The Monticello >> browser is a rather terrible interface, but at least the scoping of >> repositories was useful. Is the change intentional, or is it a bug? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Doru >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> Hi! >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Before, when one selects a package (left list), then only the set >> of relevant repositories are displayed (right list). This is now not the >> case anymore. I think I have seen somewhere a MC package is not associated >> to a repository anymore. What is the idea behind this? I find this rather >> convenient... >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Alexandre >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> >>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "Every thing has its own flow" >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> www.tudorgirba.com >> >>> >> >>> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> > >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" >
