Hi Pavel, Hi All,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.kriva...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Stef, > > our starting point looks like this: > - we have a method how to produce small image without network etc. > - we are able to load network, Monticello and Gofer in it (this job is > currently broken) > - we are able to load Metacello too - this should be the basic stage for > normal users > - than we are a le to load rest od the system at once > - we have several configurations that we are able to load and unload. > > Our biggest problem is the huge nonmodular step between Metacello image > and full Pharo. I think we shoud move forward using division. To define how > an image without development tools should look like and create two big > configurations for them. Then continue with the next splitting. > > From the practical point of view, it's always faster to remove. something > than to load something. And it's much faster to unload it without > Monticello. So I would use ugly removeAllButPackages: because it's fast, > then fix the problems like obsolete classes an Undeclared, continue with > the pretty unloding part of the configuration and finally loading part will > be easy. > Tangentially can anyone point me to a headless image with a REPL for use in testing Spur? > > -- Pavel > > 24. 11. 2013 v 22:36, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr>: > > > Hi pavel > > > > may be I should start from your miniimage and start to making sure that > the configurations can load then in a second step > > I can make sure that they can unload. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Stef > > -- best, Eliot
