On Nov 26, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> I started to play with this way of shrinking (see the attachment). At least
> it's really faster than to use MC :-)
Sure :)
Do you have a ci job to produce an image systematically?
> Where are the configurations you are creating?
I started with
a new configuration for RB
I want
Nautilus
Zinc,
Keymapping
Gofer
Fuel
Morphic
…
>
> Cheers,
> -- Pavel
>
>
> 2013/11/25 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>
>
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:11 AM, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stef,
> >
> > our starting point looks like this:
> > - we have a method how to produce small image without network etc.
> > - we are able to load network, Monticello and Gofer in it (this job is
> > currently broken)
> > - we are able to load Metacello too - this should be the basic stage for
> > normal users
>
> I would love to be able to grab an image up to the previous stage. Like that
> I can continue to work on the configurations regeneration project I have
>
> > - than we are a le to load rest od the system at once
> > - we have several configurations that we are able to load and unload.
> >
> > Our biggest problem is the huge nonmodular step between Metacello image and
> > full Pharo. I think we shoud move forward using division. To define how an
> > image without development tools should look like and create two big
> > configurations for them. Then continue with the next splitting.
>
> Yes
>
> >
> > From the practical point of view, it's always faster to remove. something
> > than to load something.
> Fun since it was difficult for me to unload I thought that I should focus on
> load :)
>
>
>
> > And it's much faster to unload it without Monticello. So I would use ugly
> > removeAllButPackages: because it's fast, then fix the problems like
> > obsolete classes an Undeclared, continue with the pretty unloding part of
> > the configuration and finally loading part will be easy.
> >
> > -- Pavel
> >
> > 24. 11. 2013 v 22:36, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> Hi pavel
> >>
> >> may be I should start from your miniimage and start to making sure that
> >> the configurations can load then in a second step
> >> I can make sure that they can unload.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> Stef
> >
>
>
>
> <shrink.st>
