>But the StackInterpreter and Stack VM should be working, right?

Yes. Use PharoSVMBuilder class for building that one.

>We just found out, that once an Image has been saved with a Cog-VM there
can be >issues with floating points because of the ordering of bits? LE vs.
BE? At least it says so i>n this README [2].
>May this be one of the problems we had when trying to start our image with
the >generated StackVM?

Not sure about that.  The FloatingPoint plugin is the FloatingPoint plugin.
And it is used in both VMs.

I can open an image with both.

> Also, which Pharo version do you reccomend to use? We downloaded the one
from this
>[1] repository. I think it is a Pharo 2.0?

Use Pharo2.0

>Thanks a lot for your help. Nice to know that the Interpreter class is not
working. :)

Everyone would love to have those all toghether but the Interpreter is
David T. Lewis thing, where Cog and Stack are Eliot thing. And Pharo does
some of its own things to Cog/Stack. + Clement working on his own stuff as
well.

Not there yet but who knows.


Phil


---
Philippe Back
Dramatic Performance Improvements
Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
Mail:[email protected] | Web: http://philippeback.eu
Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos

High Octane SPRL
rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium

Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast -
http://spamcast.libsyn.com
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value
Added Reseller




On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Kirstin Heidler <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  But the StackInterpreter and Stack VM should be working, right?
>
> We just found out, that once an Image has been saved with a Cog-VM there
> can be issues with floating points because of the ordering of bits? LE vs.
> BE? At least it says so in this README [2].
> May this be one of the problems we had when trying to start our image with
> the generated StackVM?
> Also, which Pharo version do you reccomend to use? We downloaded the one
> from this [1] repository. I think it is a Pharo 2.0?
>
> Thanks a lot for your help. Nice to know that the Interpreter class is not
> working. :)
>
> Kirstin
>
> [1] https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm
> [2] http://www.squeakvm.org/svn/squeak/branches/Cog/README
>
> Am 03.12.2013 14:10, schrieb [email protected]:
>
> Oops.  There is no pure interpreter.  Sorry. Word skipped on damn phone.
>
> On Tuesday, December 3, 2013, Kirstin Heidler wrote:
>
>>  But for some reason we have not been able to work with it correctly.
>> We may manange to build, as well as make it, but if not before it will
>> fail when we try to open our image with the new VM.
>>
>> What configuration do we need to adapt to correctly build everything with
>> the Interpreter class, or at least the StackInterpreter Class(Not
>> CoInterpreter, because we do not want to have JIT).
>>
>> Kirstin
>>
>> Am 03.12.2013 13:33, schrieb [email protected]:
>>
>> There is working pure interpreter in the pharovm.
>>
>>  Phil
>> On Tuesday, December 3, 2013, Kirstin Heidler wrote:
>>
>>> My freind Dimitri was not able to post his message. I am working with
>>> him on this.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> as part of a Seminar in the University im trying to build the PharoVM.
>>> According to the README file here ([1]) I was able to generate and to
>>> build the VM successfully.
>>>
>>> Now I would like to build the VM without Cog or Stack-to-Register
>>> optimizations... The problem here is, that I could not find any config
>>> class (which is a subclass of CPlatformConfig), that provides the right
>>> configurations and allows to build the VM without errors. I have tried
>>> to modify PharoUnixConfig(because it was the default config class), but
>>> unfortunately the build failes when the compiler tries to compile
>>> gcc3x-interp.c.
>>>
>>> Could somebody help me with this problem? How should I configure my own
>>> Config class?
>>>
>>> Basically our Group tries to implement an object table in Pharo and we
>>> want to use (and modify) the basic Interpreter class.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dimitri Korsch
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>  ---
>> Philippe Back
>> Dramatic Performance Improvements
>> Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
>> Mail:[email protected] | Web: http://philippeback.eu
>> Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
>> Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos
>>
>>  High Octane SPRL
>> rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium
>>
>>  Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
>> Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast -
>> http://spamcast.libsyn.com
>>  Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value
>> Added Reseller
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>  ---
> Philippe Back
> Dramatic Performance Improvements
> Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
> Mail:[email protected] | Web: http://philippeback.eu
> Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
> Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos
>
>  High Octane SPRL
> rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium
>
>  Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
> Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast -
> http://spamcast.libsyn.com
>  Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value
> Added Reseller
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to