For us because there are 4 or 5 class side #packages IN PHARO, not grease.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>wrote: > and why is a problem for us and for grease? > > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < > marianop...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Because many times you sent class side #packages as part of RPackage >> framework. But...if you have other class side #packages that answer >> something different...then you are screw. >> See my original post: >> http://forum.world.st/Re-Grease-conflicts-packages-with-RPackage-td4706911.html >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> sorry, but I still do not understand why this is a problem. >>> can you elaborate why it should not be more implementations? >>> >>> Esteban >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl>wrote: >>> >>>> I could copy the separate packages, but not the slice. >>>> >>>> Please note that the added test is expected to fail on all builds >>>> containing Grease-Core. >>>> >>>> Stephan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Mariano >> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >> > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
