On 04 Dec 2013, at 13:11, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> and why is a problem for us and for grease? > because people want to say MyClass package and get back the RPackage that the class is in... > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianop...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Because many times you sent class side #packages as part of RPackage > framework. But...if you have other class side #packages that answer something > different...then you are screw. > See my original post: > http://forum.world.st/Re-Grease-conflicts-packages-with-RPackage-td4706911.html > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > sorry, but I still do not understand why this is a problem. > can you elaborate why it should not be more implementations? > > Esteban > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl> wrote: > I could copy the separate packages, but not the slice. > > Please note that the added test is expected to fail on all builds containing > Grease-Core. > > Stephan > > > > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >
