2013/12/24 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>

> Yeah, that part I can understand it.
> What I don’t understand is what would be that.
>
>
Involving community is what social groups do for self-optimization and
evolution.
A model where people does not contribute code is the Microsoft EULA license.


> Packages part of pharo core are in in Pharo team in smalltalkhub
> Packages part of pharo extras are un PharoExtras team in smalltalkhub
>
>
I cannot find PharoExtras in SmalltalkHub.
Can I find from within image if a package belongs to Pharo or PharoExtras?

That information should be more visible somewhere.



> we, as core pharo developers take responsibility over the packages that
> resides there, and of course any contribution is welcome.
>
> For the stuff in Pharo team, you need to work in the form of “Issue
> report” and “SLICE provider”.
> For the stuff in PharoExtras, you can provide just the package updates +
> the *updated* configuration.
>
> All PharoExtras projects should have a jenkins job in
> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/?
> And you should take care that job is green after you commit your packages.
>
> For contribute in any of the teams, Pharo and PharoExtras you need to be
> added as team member, and that can be done just requiting it in pharo-dev
> list (which, btw, is a better place for this discussion).
>
>
Ok, thanks.

Hernán



> Esteban
>
> On 24 Dec 2013, at 13:57, Hernán Morales Durand <hernan.mora...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > El 24/12/2013 9:06, Esteban Lorenzano escribió:
> >>
> >> On 24 Dec 2013, at 12:34, Hernán Morales Durand <
> hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I am interested in how to proceed about community packages. I have
> previously asked and nobody replied:
> >>>
> >>> http://forum.world.st/Programmatic-Scoped-Browsing-td4724820.html
> >>
> >> what is a “community package”?
> >>
> >
> > The point of a community package is to involve as much of the community
> as possible.
> >
> > Hernán
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to