2013/12/24 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> > Yeah, that part I can understand it. > What I don’t understand is what would be that. > > Involving community is what social groups do for self-optimization and evolution. A model where people does not contribute code is the Microsoft EULA license.
> Packages part of pharo core are in in Pharo team in smalltalkhub > Packages part of pharo extras are un PharoExtras team in smalltalkhub > > I cannot find PharoExtras in SmalltalkHub. Can I find from within image if a package belongs to Pharo or PharoExtras? That information should be more visible somewhere. > we, as core pharo developers take responsibility over the packages that > resides there, and of course any contribution is welcome. > > For the stuff in Pharo team, you need to work in the form of “Issue > report” and “SLICE provider”. > For the stuff in PharoExtras, you can provide just the package updates + > the *updated* configuration. > > All PharoExtras projects should have a jenkins job in > https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/? > And you should take care that job is green after you commit your packages. > > For contribute in any of the teams, Pharo and PharoExtras you need to be > added as team member, and that can be done just requiting it in pharo-dev > list (which, btw, is a better place for this discussion). > > Ok, thanks. Hernán > Esteban > > On 24 Dec 2013, at 13:57, Hernán Morales Durand <hernan.mora...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > El 24/12/2013 9:06, Esteban Lorenzano escribió: > >> > >> On 24 Dec 2013, at 12:34, Hernán Morales Durand < > hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I am interested in how to proceed about community packages. I have > previously asked and nobody replied: > >>> > >>> http://forum.world.st/Programmatic-Scoped-Browsing-td4724820.html > >> > >> what is a “community package”? > >> > > > > The point of a community package is to involve as much of the community > as possible. > > > > Hernán > > > > > > >