Hi, First, I am happy to see that these efforts get noticed :). This is just the most visible part of the tremendous work happening in Moose.
Then, I think it is indeed important to start approaching the problem of the direction of the IDE explicitly. Ideally, we should indeed have one strong and novel IDE. I think there is great potential there. Cheers, Doru On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>wrote: > > On 19 Jan 2014, at 22:58, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > This is gorgeous. > > The Moose distribution of Pharo looks like to be better suitable for > code development than the vanilla one. This makes me remember the > Development image of Damien. > > > Keep in mind that we need to take care: the problem back than was that we > had actually not a good situation: we developed one image, but then people > used other tools > when they downloaded the final version. > This means that details never got fixed and improved: why put a lot of > effort into getting the details in the browser correct if everyone will use > another browser? > And that other browser did not see a lot of work, either, because it was > not part of the development effort of Pharo itself. > > It was actually quite bad. We need to really take care to not have that > again. > > And we do *not* have the manpower to manage two sets of tools anyway. > > Marcus > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
