yes, please :) On 28 Jan 2014, at 13:47, Martin Dias <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So, what to do? > - Don't send ClassModifiedClassDefinition in > SystemAnnouncer>>traitDefinitionChangedFrom: oldTrait to: newTrait ? > - Implement Trait>>layout ? > - Test for oldClassDefinition isTrait in > ClassModifiedClassDefinition>>isPropagating ? > > > > I discussed with Camille and we think it's better this other alternative: to > fix class builder to only announce ClassModifiedClassDefinition for the class > that really changed its definition. For the subclasses, it won't be > announced. This way, it's not necessary to check if it is a propagation. We > can remove the two implementors and the unique sender. > > I verified that this was the behavior of "old class builder" (in Pharo 2). Do > you agree? > > I can submit a slice this afternoon. > > MartÃn
