On 20 Feb 2014, at 13:57, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 20 Feb 2014, at 13:32, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This test is really fragile... If you look at the code you'll see that >> it has already been patched to cope with some defects under linux. >> >> - Maybe one try is to increase the wait time? >> - make sure the fork happens at higher priority than the surrounding thread >> - skip it :P > > Someone should make a choice… I vote for skipping it for now
