On 2014-02-20, at 15:18, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 20 Feb 2014, at 13:57, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 20 Feb 2014, at 13:32, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This test is really fragile... If you look at the code you'll see that >>> it has already been patched to cope with some defects under linux. >>> >>> - Maybe one try is to increase the wait time? >>> - make sure the fork happens at higher priority than the surrounding thread >>> - skip it :P >> >> Someone should make a choice… > > I vote for skipping it for now Fine with me: skip + issue tracker entry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
