Ok, I got it running now. https://github.com/philippeback/pharo-vm/raw/master/screenshots/PharoOnCentOS65-03-03-14%2022-05-23.png
There were a large number of libraries to add beyond what Mariano mentioned. I'll make a list and post later this week. That good to have it running there as it means that it also runs on RHEL. Any rpm and yum gurus around to help? Phil On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected] > wrote: > I do have Pharo running in CentOS 64 bits since a few months already. The > way I installed dependencies was: > > sudo yum install libX11.i686 libX11-devel.i686 mesa-libGL.i686 > mesa-libGL-devel.i686 > > And then since I was using Zodiac: > > sudo yum install openssl098e.i686 openssl.i686 > sudo cp /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8e /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 > ldd /opt/pharo/pharoVM/libSqueakSSL.so > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sergi Reyner wrote: >> >> 2014-03-03 9:21 GMT+00:00 Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]>: >> >> A few weeks ago, I wanted to quickly update the pharo in my VPS which >> runs my IRC bot. >> >> Cent0S 6.5 (and others) cannot use latest VM from get.pharo.org >>> because of different glibc version. >>> >> >> Fedora, Debian, OpenSuSE, Mint, CentOS, even older Ubuntus... after >> going throught the list of available distros and installing every one of >> them, I was left with two choices for setting up Pharo in my VPS: Gentoo >> and the latest Ubuntu. I did not want to install Ubuntu in the first place >> because of their policy of "latest of some things, and obsolete versions of >> something else" which has bitten me time and again. But I did install it, >> because I had even less interest in maintaning a remote gentoo. >> >> So you have to compile the VM on your own. This is a (probably >>> incomplete) set of the packages you will need for this task on 64-bit >>> system: >>> >> >> Wouldn´t it be better for everyone to have Pharo compiled against an >> "older" Glibc, for example, debian´s one, so it can run on more >> distributions than "latest ubuntu"? From my point of view, asking people to >> compile their own VMs doesn´t seem to foster usability. >> >> Cheers, >> Sergi >> >> Would statically linking Linux PharoVM against optimal 32-bit glibc make >> things easier for users? What would be the file size penalty and are there >> other issues to consider? File size is less of an issue than it used to >> be. >> cheers -ben >> > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >
