Just for the sake of argument, I also don't like how things are broken down to one file per method and class being that json thing. Looks weird, and makes viewing code on github very tedious.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Dale Henrichs < [email protected]> wrote: > Haha, sleep is overrated:) > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 06.03.2014, at 23:34, Dale Henrichs <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> My dream has finally come true ... Smalltalkers arguing the merits of git >> vs. mercurial! >> >> >> How do you sleep at night?? :p >> >> >> Alternate implementations to FileTree are welcome! >> >> Dale >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jan Vrany <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> The integration in Newspeak is quite different. It is file based, above >>>> mercurial (which makes no difference) but the tools one uses are in >>>> Newspeak. So mercurial really is just a back-end. Given that >>>> organizations and alphabetical order of selectors within protocols, >>>> classes within categories, etc, keeps things stable I find mercurial >>>> diffs are still pretty readable with file-specific command-line or GUI >>>> tools. Method-level granularity seems a very poor choice, IMNSHO. >>>> >>>> >>> +1. >>> In St/X I do exactly the same. Works just fine. >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
