LOLWAT! :D for what is worth, my experience..
I don’t know mercurial and I was ~8 months flirting with git and in a relationship since ~4 Git is okay Exposing the code out there in a way others can use their familiar commands to test our software is something I find very healthy But for us, automation is the real winner and git kind of helped with it (not that is a total requisite, but it was a way to have both “profits” in one move) On Mar 6, 2014, at 7:34 PM, Dale Henrichs <[email protected]> wrote: > My dream has finally come true ... Smalltalkers arguing the merits of git vs. > mercurial! > > Alternate implementations to FileTree are welcome! > > Dale > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jan Vrany <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The integration in Newspeak is quite different. It is file based, above > mercurial (which makes no difference) but the tools one uses are in > Newspeak. So mercurial really is just a back-end. Given that > organizations and alphabetical order of selectors within protocols, > classes within categories, etc, keeps things stable I find mercurial > diffs are still pretty readable with file-specific command-line or GUI > tools. Method-level granularity seems a very poor choice, IMNSHO. > > > +1. > In St/X I do exactly the same. Works just fine. > > Jan > > >
