Am 03.03.2014 um 14:22 schrieb Johan Fabry <[email protected]>:

> +1 to that! It would be good to have some kind of uniform syntax for 
> constructing queries. Especially now that the use of JSON objects is quite 
> common.
> 
I would like to have that, too. I need to have query support for elasticsearch 
and I would do something similar like MongoQueries. The idea of having a common 
query syntax is nice but I’m not convinced it will be easy to do. The parser 
needs to be easily extendable because most applications will have their custom 
additions to the base syntax.

Norbert

> The OP was actually referring to MongoQueries. To get some examples of the 
> syntax see section 4 of 
> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoForTheEnterprise/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Voyage/Voyage.pier.html
> 
> On Mar 3, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> What would be nice is to have an abstraction like mongoTalk on top to avoid 
>>> to manipulate strings but to manipulate query elements.
>> 
>> That is a nice idea.
>> 
>> Alexandre
> 
> 
> 
> ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
> 
> Johan Fabry   -   http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
> PLEIAD lab  -  Computer Science Department (DCC)  -  University of Chile
> 
> 


Reply via email to