Just avoiding to only manipulate strings would be already good. On 09 Mar 2014, at 11:22, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Am 03.03.2014 um 14:22 schrieb Johan Fabry <[email protected]>: > >> +1 to that! It would be good to have some kind of uniform syntax for >> constructing queries. Especially now that the use of JSON objects is quite >> common. >> > I would like to have that, too. I need to have query support for > elasticsearch and I would do something similar like MongoQueries. The idea of > having a common query syntax is nice but I’m not convinced it will be easy to > do. The parser needs to be easily extendable because most applications will > have their custom additions to the base syntax. > > Norbert > >> The OP was actually referring to MongoQueries. To get some examples of the >> syntax see section 4 of >> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoForTheEnterprise/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Voyage/Voyage.pier.html >> >> On Mar 3, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> What would be nice is to have an abstraction like mongoTalk on top to >>>> avoid to manipulate strings but to manipulate query elements. >>> >>> That is a nice idea. >>> >>> Alexandre >> >> >> >> ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- >> >> Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry >> PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile >> >> > >
