Hi, Sure he is repeating things. And sure he is reinventing half of what we already have.
However, he is likely to get more traction because he reinvents the UI, not the core concepts. You could say it is not an essential contribution. But, it is. Doru On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, guy just repeating almost same thesis as in the original Self demo > dated back in '95, > "direct manipulation with objects errr.. data".. > except that now in crappy web-based environment.. and still missing the > point.. > because it is not about data, it is about objects. > > > > > On 29 March 2014 18:20, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Beautiful demo. This should be our game, yet others are playing it :(. >> >> Doru >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> On 29 Mar 2014, at 10:38, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > This is a nice write down: >>> > >>> > http://www.chris-granger.com/2014/03/27/toward-a-better-programming/ >>> > >>> > with a nice demo of a prototype: >>> > >>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6iUm_Cqx2s >>> > >>> > Luckily, the horrible C++ code computing standard deviation in the >>> article can be written quite elegantly and directly in Pharo: >>> > >>> > | input | >>> > input := #(2 4 4 4 5 5 7 9). >>> > (((input - input average) raisedTo: 2) sum / (input size - 1)) sort. >>> > >>> > Sven >>> >>> Damn spelling correction ;-) >>> >>> | input | >>> input := #(2 4 4 4 5 5 7 9). >>> (((input - input average) raisedTo: 2) sum / (input size - 1)) sqrt. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
