On 19/5/14 14:31, Tudor Girba wrote:
Me too. I already gave a first set of feedback.
As a general matter, I would be interested in:
- unifying with the ZnLogEvent
first we should integrate it and make sure that all the Transcript show
are funnelled to the Log frameworks.
- Split the Log class
we will not split it because we iterated over the design since 8 months
with norbert :)
- Possibly support Fuel serialization for each log entry
Please go ahead.
Doru
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:01 AM, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
SystemLogger interests me as well.
Phil
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Norbert Hartl
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Stef,
I’m definitely in for the SystemLogger. But as I am involved
in it anyway a fresh look from another person on that stuff
could be benefitial.
Norbert
Am 19.05.2014 um 09:10 schrieb stepharo <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
> Hi guys
>
> This is a call for some of you that committed code and would
like to do it with me :).
> I have some projects that I would like to push further in
4.0 and I'm thinking that
> he could be much more fun to do it with other people.
>
> Here are some topics
> - integrating the systemLogger
> - integrating/improving the new method categorizer
> - cleaning fonts
> - ...
>
> How this could work?
> We could have
> - some discussions
> - make a little roadmap
> - then we could work on the same slice and do code review
>
> I think that it can be fun and motivating. So let me know
because I would like to have more social
> coding.
>
> Stef
>
--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
"Every thing has its own flow"
