Am 21.05.2014 um 08:24 schrieb stepharo <[email protected]>: > > On 19/5/14 14:31, Tudor Girba wrote: >> Me too. I already gave a first set of feedback. >> >> As a general matter, I would be interested in: >> - unifying with the ZnLogEvent > If this means talking to Sven this is a definite yes. I don’t think we need to unify with the current ZnLogEvent. Syncing with zinc is probably not the way to go anyway. Zinc is still an external framework (hence the namespace prefix). I did a zinc bridge which operates an a single event bridging from zinc to SystemLogger. This is not clever performance wise. A better approach is to plug into zincs LogSupport. We should hook into there so we just get the invocations from zinc and we can emit the proper SystemLogger events into the Log framework. Sven will come up with something announcement based. And that is still a task for us, too. To look where functionality of SystemLogger is doubled with announcements.
> first we should integrate it and make sure that all the Transcript show are > funnelled to the Log frameworks. Yes. Maybe we need to sync our understanding of log levels first. The exchange adds a log level and adding a tag would be good, too. >> - Split the Log class > > we will not split it because we iterated over the design since 8 months with > norbert :) I cannot find the proposals of Doru. But I’m interested. I splitted the Log class already into BasicLog and Log. I’m not fully satisfied with it so … My concern about the Log class is more how get it right supporting different kind of Log classes and still have a working filtering in the Logger. But that we can discuss in the groups that form I guess > >> - Possibly support Fuel serialization for each log entry > Please go ahead. Yes. I don’t even understand what it means :) Norbert >> >> Doru >> >> >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:01 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> SystemLogger interests me as well. >> >> Phil >> >> >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Stef, >> >> I’m definitely in for the SystemLogger. But as I am involved in it anyway a >> fresh look from another person on that stuff could be benefitial. >> >> Norbert >> >> Am 19.05.2014 um 09:10 schrieb stepharo <[email protected]>: >> >> > Hi guys >> > >> > This is a call for some of you that committed code and would like to do it >> > with me :). >> > I have some projects that I would like to push further in 4.0 and I'm >> > thinking that >> > he could be much more fun to do it with other people. >> > >> > Here are some topics >> > - integrating the systemLogger >> > - integrating/improving the new method categorizer >> > - cleaning fonts >> > - ... >> > >> > How this could work? >> > We could have >> > - some discussions >> > - make a little roadmap >> > - then we could work on the same slice and do code review >> > >> > I think that it can be fun and motivating. So let me know because I would >> > like to have more social >> > coding. >> > >> > Stef >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >
