and +1 for me. On 27 May 2014, at 01:57, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote:
> GOUBIER Thierry wrote: >> In my own code, I allways use ClassOrganization>>#realCategories to avoid >> getting the --all-- category. I consider the --all-- category to be a GUI >> artifact, not a class organization concept. >> >> I'd prefer a #protocols (without the --all-- category, of course :)) so ok >> for deprecating #categories. >> > +1 for #protocols >> Thierry >> ________________________________________ >> De : Pharo-dev [[email protected]] de la part de Esteban >> Lorenzano [[email protected]] >> Envoyé : lundi 26 mai 2014 21:20 >> À : Pharo Development List >> Objet : [Pharo-dev] is ClassOrganization>>#categories right? >> >> Hi, >> >> I wonder is current implementation of that method is good: right now, it >> answers all categories, including virtual ones (—all—). >> A lot of things are made in that assumption, but I wonder if is not better >> to answer just real categories and to create a new method called >> #allCategories to answer the reals and the virtuals. >> >> Also, I wonder if wouldn’t be better to just deprecate #categories and use >> the correct abstraction: #protocols. >> >> any opinions? >> >> Esteban >> >> >> > > >
