On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:38 AM, GOUBIER Thierry <[email protected]> wrote: > > ________________________________________ > > De : Pharo-dev [[email protected]] de la part de Marcus > Denker [[email protected]] > Envoyé : mardi 27 mai 2014 09:58 > À : Pharo Development List > Objet : Re: [Pharo-dev] is ClassOrganization>>#categories right? > > > On 27 May 2014, at 01:57, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> GOUBIER Thierry wrote: >>> In my own code, I allways use ClassOrganization>>#realCategories to avoid >>> getting the --all-- category. I consider the --all-- category to be a GUI >>> artifact, not a class organization concept. >>> >>> I'd prefer a #protocols (without the --all-- category, of course :)) so >>> ok for deprecating #categories. >>> >> +1 for #protocols > > returning protocol objects, not symbols… > > Up to you, just that it is consistent... protocol objects everywhere, or > symbols everywhere. #categories for symbols, #protocols for protocol objects > (and #addCategory: for symbols, #addProtocol: for protocols, and so on...). > > A subject for the Pharo Sprint planned by Serge in Paris in two weeks time ?
Why not, we have time in the afternoons. More details about the planned MOOSEDAY in Paris: http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/MOOSEDayUPMC/ Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
