That is exactly my point. But Stef currently tries to enforce this
workflow of working to Moose. And since this workflow will not work
well for Moose (because of the demands on the process), I object to this.
I don't think Stef wants to impose the workflow. Stef wants to improve
code modularity in Moose and avoid broken / bad configs.
Moose is a big project and one solution to ease the maintenance is to
use a tool (Versionner for example).
Now it is clear that Versionner does not have all features to support
the Moose process and I will take some time to see how to implement a
smart deep release.
With that, it should be enough to support Moose workflow.
We want to have a working workflow :)
And the point is to make one becoming true. After we can discuss.
Stef