2014-07-15 17:34 GMT+02:00 Goubier Thierry <[email protected]>:

> I've never seen that in VW. But your feedback is interesting; maybe there
> is something to look at.
>
>
No, sorry for misunderstanding, it was closed source developments in VW...


> I wonder if looking at some of the GTPlayground stuff with another angle
> could be interesting (i.e. page approach) or simply study what could be
> done if we could capture a task by embedding morphs inside the text.
>
> I feel like the notebook concept in itself is poor in that you have to
> interact with the program objects via the command line (i.e. the language
> console; be it R or Python, or Mathlab) and that is certainly inferior to
> the ability to select and run anywhere, inspect, explore, playground stuff.
>
> Le 15/07/2014 17:21, Nicolas Cellier a écrit :
>
>  We had this kind of workbook 20 years ago in VW with mathematical
>> formulae and graphics (plot) embedded.
>> What we did was to avoid continous scrolling of the whole document, but
>> rather have the plan of the document on the left pane of the notebook
>> (just an indented tree like word navigation mode), and the text on the
>> right pane for only the currently selected chapter (in a way, it's a lot
>> like the source code browser). This way, no need to compose very large
>> Text in Smalltalk (I also doubt our editors really scale).
>> Then we could output a static view in PostScript or LaTeX.
>>
>> The greatest limitation IMO was not really the UI, but the principle of
>> the Notebook itself: we soon needed to access the results of previous
>> chunks of code, and we implemented this with an environment (understand
>> some global variables).
>>  From software quality POV, working with such global vars is very
>> disappointing and does not really scale either.
>>
>> The second limitation of the workbook is that, while it's very good for
>> small projects (like maybe we can have in school), it's not the right
>> tool for producing documents with a synthesis of the results, which
>> remain the main added value of humans, so which was what we were asked
>> for.
>>
>> However I'm still curious how far we can go with those notebooks,
>> because the idea is seducing. Maybe it was our own usage which was bad...
>>
>
> Thierry
> --
> Thierry Goubier
> CEA list
> Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués
> 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex
> France
> Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95
>
>

Reply via email to