I don't like it. First its not suitable for my project since my project contains python files as well. Second get 30 mbs image so you can get an additional few kbs sounds like an overkill. Forth what happens to the image you work already ? what if it contains code you want to keep ? send the user to the process of reimporting the code is not acceptable for me either.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote: > I’m follower of "new day – new image” way :) > > Uko > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:48, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well lately I have been questioning the need for configurations . I am > considering doing only the second port of your blog post. Ask github for > the latest release of my project , download it, unzip it and point pharo to > the unziped directory. Then pharo can periodocally keep probing github to > see if there is a new release and prompt the user for an update. All that > with a single click from the user or even automagically. But I have to > figure out how to do that with Pharo first :) > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> You don’t have to. Just keep your configuration (here is a guide how to >> do it >> http://sleepycoders.blogspot.ch/2014/04/how-to-distribute-your-github-pharo.html) >> on some monticello repo, and assemble your image on CI. Yes, if someone >> want’s to modify your project they have to use git, but as far as I know, >> Pharo is slowly moving git way anyway :) >> >> Cheers. >> Uko >> >> On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:17, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> yeah I will also move my latest project to github. I am already more >> active with github than I am in SThub anyway. The one thing that stopped me >> so far is that I don't want to force people to install git to get the >> latest version of my project. SThub is great for this. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have >>> configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway it’s >>> a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my >>> configurations? Because that’s the only thing I version with monticello are >>> configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here >>> reliability is much more important then other features. >>> >>> Uko >>> >>> >>> On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my >>>> SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects >>>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >>>> >>>> Uko >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
