looks very interesting but I see you pull from a specific git commit , what if I wanted to pull from latest commit ?
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Dale Henrichs < [email protected]> wrote: > Hey Uko, > > I guess I wasn't clear;( > > What is not needed when using git are the version methods with the > painstaking records of the mcz version associated with each file ... > > A baseline is created by subclassing BaselineOf and adding a single > baseline: method that contains the package/project dependencies. This > BaselineOfXXX is saved directly in the repository along with the packages. > > You can poke around in my External project on GitHub[1] to see more detail. > > Dale > > [1] https://github.com/dalehenrich/external/tree/master/repository > > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Dale, >> >> I won’t agree that you don’t need configuration. For me the main purpose >> of configuration is defining dependencies. And as far as I know we don’t >> have any other alternative. >> >> Uko >> >> On 05 Aug 2014, at 17:21, Dale Henrichs <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Kilon, >> >> When working with git/github, you really don't need a configuration >> anymore ... the configuration functions more like tag than anything else. >> >> For day to day operations with git/github you only need a baseline[1]. >> The baseline just describes the package relationships and of course git >> manages the versions of the packages: >> >> baseline: spec >> <baseline> >> spec for: #common do: [ >> spec configuration: 'Seaside30' with: [ >> spec >> version: #stable; >> repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/MetacelloRepository' ]. >> spec >> package: 'Sample-Core'with: [ >> spec requires: 'Seaside30' ]; >> package: 'Sample-Tests' with: [ >> spec requires: 'Sample-Core' ]]. >> >> but there is no longer any need to track the version numbers of the >> individual mcz file. >> >> To load from a repository using a baseline you do the following: >> >> Metacello new >> baseline: 'External'; >> repository: 'github://dalehenrich/external:master/repository'; >> load. >> >> This is very similar to using #bleedingEdge,but a lot safer, since >> presumably you are using travis-ci to run tests before anything gets merged >> into your master branch and of course all of the packages are versioned >> together. >> >> To refresh the version from the master branch you do the following: >> >> Metacello new >> baseline: 'External'; >> repository: 'github://dalehenrich/external:master/repository'; >> get. >> Metacello new >> baseline: 'External'; >> repository: 'github://dalehenrich/external:master/repository'; >> load. >> >> This is admittedly a bit awkward, but there has been a couple year lag >> between the time I did the basic implementation in support of git/github >> and the time that folks are finally becoming interested in actually using >> it:) So I have focussed on functionality instead or prettiness ... I will >> eventually get to the point where you can do:) >> >> Metacello new >> baseline: 'External'; >> repository: 'github://dalehenrich/external:master/repository'; >> get; >> load. >> >> If you use a configuration, then the version method for the configuration >> would look like the following: >> >> version0900: spec >> <version: '0.9.0'> >> spec >> for: #'common' >> do: [ >> spec blessing: #'development'. >> spec description: 'initial work: first commit on custom >> branch'. >> spec author: 'dkh'. >> spec timestamp: '5/4/2012 14:16'. >> spec >> baseline: 'External' >> with: [ spec repository: ' >> github://dalehenrich/external:1ac58502ade7814e1590f71d615cca434b1a4fd5/repository' >> ] ] >> >> So version 0.9.0 is simply a tag for a particular commit ... but within >> the Metacello eco-system this approach can be useful. >> >> Dale >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work/blob/master/docs/GettingStartedWithGitHub.md#create-baseline >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:48 AM, kilon alios <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Well lately I have been questioning the need for configurations . I am >>> considering doing only the second port of your blog post. Ask github for >>> the latest release of my project , download it, unzip it and point pharo to >>> the unziped directory. Then pharo can periodocally keep probing github to >>> see if there is a new release and prompt the user for an update. All that >>> with a single click from the user or even automagically. But I have to >>> figure out how to do that with Pharo first :) >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> You don’t have to. Just keep your configuration (here is a guide how to >>>> do it >>>> http://sleepycoders.blogspot.ch/2014/04/how-to-distribute-your-github-pharo.html) >>>> on some monticello repo, and assemble your image on CI. Yes, if someone >>>> want’s to modify your project they have to use git, but as far as I know, >>>> Pharo is slowly moving git way anyway :) >>>> >>>> Cheers. >>>> Uko >>>> >>>> On 04 Aug 2014, at 11:17, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> yeah I will also move my latest project to github. I am already more >>>> active with github than I am in SThub anyway. The one thing that stopped me >>>> so far is that I don't want to force people to install git to get the >>>> latest version of my project. SThub is great for this. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well, thankfully I keep all my latest projects on github, and I have >>>>> configurations of them in the image. But CI is not working and anyway it’s >>>>> a strange situation. Is there any other service where I can keep my >>>>> configurations? Because that’s the only thing I version with monticello >>>>> are >>>>> configurations as I want to use gofer to load my projects. And here >>>>> reliability is much more important then other features. >>>>> >>>>> Uko >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:59, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> oh boy thats looks nasty bug, hope its not permanent. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I was on vacation last weak, have I missed anything? Because my >>>>>> SmaltalkHub user does not have any projects >>>>>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~YuriyTymchuk (and I had a bunch of them). >>>>>> >>>>>> Uko >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
