Yes, you should add a slice in the Pharo inbox with your contribution but ... it depends under which license you first published your contribution. If it was MIT, it is fine (and spec is out of law). If it was the double licensing, we will not be able to integrate it into Pharo. We should re-implement this functionality. I know these things are boring but we should take care to avoid potential problems in the future.
Le 4 sept. 2014 à 11:13, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit : > Oh wow, it’s amazing how complicated things can get… What you I have to do to > have fixes available in Pharo? Send a slice to Pharo inbox? I just want to > use dark theme in pharo and don’t have ugly UI parts > > Uko > > On 04 Sep 2014, at 10:52, Christophe Demarey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> Le 3 sept. 2014 à 10:24, Torsten Bergmann a écrit : >> >>> It is interesting that there is also a new Spec release [2] announced this >>> week >> >> I can see in the announce: >> Adds SpecTableLayout, thanks @webwarrior-ws >> Removes hardcoded colors, thanks @Uko >> >> Do the authors of contribution (or their company if the contribution is done >> at work) agree on the new spec license? >> If not, it cannot be part of the new spec and could be integrated in Pharo >> spec. >> If so, we won't be able to integrate these fixes in Pharo. >> >> It woud be good that spec contributors clarify their position. >> >> Regards, >> Christophe. >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
